Deferred Deep Linking in 2025: How Does it Work, and Why is it So Complicated?

February 20, 2025
6 min read
Understanding the complexities of deferred deep linking in the age of mobile privacy.

Deferred deep linking is a crucial technology for mobile app developers, allowing users to be directed to specific content within an app even if they have to install the app first. But in 2025, it's become a surprisingly complex problem. Let's break down why.

The Core Problem: Privacy

The biggest hurdle for deferred deep linking is user privacy. Both Apple (with iOS) and Google (with Android) have implemented strict privacy policies that make it impossible to directly pass data from the app store to the newly installed app. Think about it: you click a link, get sent to the App Store, install the app, and then... how does the app know which link you clicked? The app stores don't tell it.

This is intentional. Allowing direct data transfer would open the door to widespread user tracking and fingerprinting, something both companies are actively trying to prevent.

The Solution: Cloud Fingerprinting (and its limitations)

Since we can't get data directly from the app stores, the industry has largely relied on a technique called cloud fingerprinting. Here's the basic idea:

  1. Click: When a user clicks a deep link, the link first goes to a server (the "cloud"). This server collects as much information as possible about the user's device without violating privacy rules. This might include:

    • IP Address
    • Operating System (iOS or Android)
    • OS Version (to a certain degree of granularity)
    • Device Type (phone, tablet)
    • Screen Size
    • Language Settings
    • Time Zone
    • Limited information from the User-Agent string
  2. App Store: The user is then redirected to the appropriate app store.

  3. Install & Open: The user installs and opens the app.

  4. App-Side Fingerprint: The app, upon opening, also collects the same set of information about the device.

  5. Matching: The app sends this fingerprint to the same cloud server. The server compares this new fingerprint to the fingerprints it collected from recent link clicks. If it finds a close match within a short time window, it assumes it's the same user.

  6. Deferred Linking: The server then tells the app which link the user originally clicked, and the app can navigate the user to the correct content.

This works reasonably well, but it's far from perfect. Here's why:

  • Probabilistic, Not Deterministic: It's based on probabilities. If two users with very similar devices click the same link around the same time, the system can get confused. Accuracy rates are generally good, but not 100%.
  • Time Window: The matching has to happen within a short time window (usually a few hours). If a user installs the app a day later, the fingerprint is likely useless.
  • IP Address Changes: IP addresses can change, especially on mobile networks. This can break the fingerprint.
  • Increasing Restrictions: Apple and Google are constantly tightening privacy restrictions, making it harder to collect even the limited fingerprinting data.

The Real Problem: Marketing-First Bloatware

The biggest players in deferred deep linking - Branch, AppsFlyer, and others - aren't just deep linking solutions. They're full-scale marketing and analytics platforms that use deep linking as a gateway to lock you into their ecosystem. This creates several significant problems:

1. Paying for Features You Don't Need

Most apps already have dedicated analytics solutions (Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Amplitude, etc.). Yet these deep linking platforms bundle their own analytics, attribution, and marketing tools - forcing you to pay for redundant functionality. It's like buying a whole Swiss Army knife when you only need the bottle opener.

2. Platform Lock-in

Once you integrate these platforms, they position themselves as the "source of truth" for your user journeys. This makes it increasingly difficult to switch providers or use multiple solutions, as your user data becomes siloed within their ecosystem.

Comparative Costs for Deferred Deep Linking Services

Let's break down the actual costs across different providers (as of 2025):

| Monthly Active Users | Branch.io | AppsFlyer | Airbridge | DeepLinkNow | | -------------------- | ------------- | ----------- | ------------------- | ------------ | | Free Tier | Up to 10k MAU | Zero Plan* | - | Up to 5k MAU | | 50,000 MAU | $299/mo | $1,050/mo† | $199/mo ($2,300/yr) | $49/mo | | 100,000 MAU | $499/mo | $2,100/mo† | $299/mo ($3,500/yr) | $99/mo | | 1,000,000+ MAU | Custom | $21,000/mo† | Custom | $499/mo |

*AppsFlyer's Zero Plan includes basic deep linking features only †Calculated at 7¢ per conversion with 30% conversion rate (industry average)

But here's the catch: these prices often don't tell the whole story. Many providers have significant hidden costs:

Hidden Costs and Limitations

  1. Annual Contracts Required

    • Most enterprise plans require annual commitments
    • Airbridge requires annual payment upfront
    • AppsFlyer's enterprise features require long-term contracts
  2. Feature Paywalls

    • Basic deep linking often available, but advanced features require premium tiers
    • AppsFlyer's Zero plan includes basic deep linking but lacks attribution
    • Branch requires higher tiers for features like data export and custom domains
    • Airbridge limits tracking links (5,000 for 50K MAU plan, 10,000 for 100K MAU plan)
  3. Technical Support Costs

    • Premium support often requires enterprise plans
    • AppsFlyer provides only self-service support on lower tiers
    • Airbridge offers onboarding support only on higher tiers
  4. Data Storage and Processing

    • Limited data retention on basic plans
    • Additional costs for extended data retention
    • Query limits and API rate restrictions
    • Airbridge counts QR codes separately from tracking links
  5. Integration Complexity

    • Many providers require their full SDK implementation
    • Server-to-server integrations often limited to enterprise plans
    • Hidden development costs for integration and maintenance

The Need for Simpler Solutions: DeepLinkNow

This is where DeepLinkNow comes in. We believe that deferred deep linking shouldn't require massive SDKs, invasive tracking, or exorbitant costs. We've built a lightweight solution that focuses on:

  • Minimal Fingerprinting: We collect only the essential data needed for deferred deep linking, respecting user privacy.
  • Small SDK Size: Our SDKs are tiny, minimizing the impact on your app's size.
  • Simple Integration: We've designed our SDKs to be easy to integrate and use.
  • Affordable Pricing: We offer transparent and affordable pricing plans.

We're committed to providing a deferred deep linking solution that balances effectiveness with user privacy and developer convenience. In a world of increasingly complex and invasive tracking, we believe a simpler, more ethical approach is needed.

Continue Reading

View all blog posts